PDA

View Full Version : Are fat chicks better fucks?



Mrs Roops
07-19-2007, 12:03 AM
(or we could ask something more sexual: Do you think fat chicks are better fucks?

Someone told me on the weekend that fat chicks were better fucks b/c their pussies are like vacuum cleaners......
Jeeze, do you think so? I’ve prided myself on being an incredibly good fuck!!!!

I’ve been told more than once by ex-bfs that I was the best fuck they ever had and I know that my Husband (who how can I put it, has been around and then some before he met me) is satisfied.

To think that I could be even better at fucking if I stopped working my arse off exercising and perhaps I started scoffing Galaxy bars (my fav chocolate) is somewhat depressing. I thought I was sublime at sex ‘cos I was fit, athletic, and more than happy to take it in any orifice, now I gotta be fat as well!!!!

BTW, constant Kegel exercising means that I have exceptionally good cunt control. Lets put it this way, I could sit astride you with cock in cunt, neither of us moving and I can still make you cum……. Dyson and Hoover eat your heart out!!!!

Fancier
07-19-2007, 12:27 AM
I could sit astride you with cock in cunt, neither of us moving and I can still make you cum…….
Yes, you could, but - alas - you won't! (sigh) :D

Mrs Roops
07-19-2007, 12:40 AM
Thinking about it, apart from the huge tum, my breasts and vulva were a little bit plumper when I was heavily pregnant. We fucked almost up to giving birth. I'll try and rember to ask Roops if I was a better fuck for it!!!!

Fancier
07-20-2007, 01:25 AM
Someone told me on the weekend that fat chicks were better fucks b/c their pussies are like vacuum cleaners......
Fat men, on the other hand, are not such good fucks because fat builds
up round the base of the penis. It is then effectively shorter since the fat
prevents it being inserted fully. The ideal couple therefore looks like this:

Ginger
07-20-2007, 06:30 PM
Thinking about it, apart from the huge tum, my breasts and vulva were a little bit plumper when I was heavily pregnant. We fucked almost up to giving birth. I'll try and rember to ask Roops if I was a better fuck for it!!!!

I was about 10kg heavier than I am now when I first met my husband and he loved my bigger arse, especially doing it doggy style. He tells me he loved watching it wobble as he pounded into me from behind.

...and when I was pregnant (yes I confess I'm not just a wifey but also a mum - hopefully a MILF) we had AMAZING sex. I was so horny, my pussy seemed to be constantly engorged and my breasts were incredibly sensitive. That's also when I discovered how rough I loved it on my nipples. We're talking sucking so hard that I had big red marks that would last for days!!

Getting sidetracked from the fat topic into the world of pregnancy here I know but it's the closest thing I've experienced to being huge...

Mrs Roops
07-21-2007, 09:19 PM
I was about 10kg heavier than I am now when I first met my husband and he loved my bigger arse, especially doing it doggy style. He tells me he loved watching it wobble as he pounded into me from behind.

...and when I was pregnant (yes I confess I'm not just a wifey but also a mum - hopefully a MILF) we had AMAZING sex. I was so horny, my pussy seemed to be constantly engorged and my breasts were incredibly sensitive. That's also when I discovered how rough I loved it on my nipples. We're talking sucking so hard that I had big red marks that would last for days!!

Getting sidetracked from the fat topic into the world of pregnancy here I know but it's the closest thing I've experienced to being huge...
Yep, I know what you mean, esp about the nipples being more sensitive!!! As I said, we fucked almost right up to birth. With my first pregnancy I think we fucked up to a week before, but on the second we had sex one morning and I delivered later that night!!

Mrs Roops
07-21-2007, 09:23 PM
Thinking about it, apart from the huge tum, my breasts and vulva were a little bit plumper when I was heavily pregnant. We fucked almost up to giving birth. I'll try and rember to ask Roops if I was a better fuck for it!!!!
Inconclusive answer from Roops I’m afraid. Apparently I’m always the best fuck there is whatever my size!!!!!. I also asked if he had fucked any fat (as in Bessie Bunter fat) girls in his pre-married life of wanton debauchery.

He admitted to fucking two fat girls, one was a one-night stand, the other was a relationship that lasted a fortnight. Sex-wise he did not notice any improvement over thin and average build women except to say he needed to spread their legs wider. (I think he was joking on that bit). The girl who he went out with for two weeks is interesting. She liked to be completely naked and blindfolded and to have her hands tied behind her back, Whilst kneeling down, she wanted Roops to be fully clothed and to approach her, whip out his penis and force it into her moth right up to the hilt and whilst firmly holding her head, to literally fuck her face as opposed to receiving oral. Roops was 22 at the time and this was his first experience of "kinkyness". It sorta freaked him out. He, like me, is not into that sorta thing and seeing where the relationship was going, called an end to the relationship.

I suppose the only way determining Annie’s theory is to take a sample of 20 thin girls and get a group of men to fuck every single one of them. Next, fatten up the women with a crash course of binge eating until they are of the required fatness and then get the same men to fuck them, noting any improvements (if any) of coital pleasure.

Panicindetroit
07-22-2007, 12:24 AM
I suppose the only way determining Annie’s theory is to take a sample of 20 thin girls and get a group of men to fuck every single one of them. Next, fatten up the women with a crash course of binge eating until they are of the required fatness and then get the same men to fuck them, noting any improvements (if any) of coital pleasure.

Now this is the kind of research I'd like to participate in. Any volunteers needed? :D

Fancier
07-22-2007, 02:48 AM
I don't think much of Mrs R's experimental design. She has failed to control
for the order of treatments: there may be an effect that depends on
whether the man is fucking the same girl for the first or second time, and
this variable is not balanced out in the design. Half the girls should be
thin then fat, the other half fat then thin. Also all trials should be 'blind' -
so that the man doesn't know whether he has his dick in a fat or thin girl.
B-minus :D

Panicindetroit
07-22-2007, 07:17 AM
Don't listen to Fancier. He's his grumpy old self again. Those modifications would make it a very artificial experience. Testers and tested should be allowed to look each other straight into the eyes. Also, there shouldn't be any restrictions in fondling whatever bodily parts they wanted to. Go for Mrs R's original full-A test plan I say!

Fancier
07-22-2007, 09:18 AM
Don't listen to Fancier. He's his grumpy old self again
Did you miss my ":D" ?



Go for Mrs R's original full-A test plan I say!
Quite right PiD. What does valid experimental design matter,
as long as everyone has a good time! :D

thesofamonster
07-22-2007, 10:31 PM
I suppose the only way determining Annie’s theory is to take a sample of 20 thin girls and get a group of men to fuck every single one of them. Next, fatten up the women with a crash course of binge eating until they are of the required fatness and then get the same men to fuck them, noting any improvements (if any) of coital pleasure.

send all test participants here

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/outlook/news/story/2007/07/070716_happinessstory_nigeria.shtml

0beron
07-23-2007, 12:51 AM
The girl who he went out with for two weeks is interesting. She liked to be completely naked and blindfolded and to have her hands tied behind her back, Whilst kneeling down, she wanted Roops to be fully clothed and to approach her, whip out his penis and force it into her moth right up to the hilt and whilst firmly holding her head, to literally fuck her face as opposed to receiving oral. Roops was 22 at the time and this was his first experience of "kinkyness". It sorta freaked him out. He, like me, is not into that sorta thing and seeing where the relationship was going, called an end to the relationship.
Um, hmm. I'm going to chime in with my own data point. I had a similar romantic interlude one evening with a young (and large) lady a few years back. She was into being dominated and humiliated (sorry to be dull, but I successfully resisted her entreaties to piss on her, or in her).

She was a student, pretty, very smart, and in talking with her I got the impression she had a veritable cargo ship of unresolved issues, mostly pertaining to her father. I rapidly started to realise that her fat was a form of protective clothing for her emotions, as was her need to be subjugated sexually (in ordinary conversation her personality was not the least bit submissive, and while chatting with her was very entertaining, it wasn't what you'd call relaxing. You had to think fast).

To cut a long story short to it's ignominious end, I came to the conclusion that this girl was spooky, and not in a good way, and I broke with her with minimal delay. I still think about her every so often with some regret. If I had to do it over again I don't know if I'd handle it the same way.

I can't remember what her pussy was like. Her mouth was extraordinary, though.

Mrs Roops
07-24-2007, 02:04 AM
I don't think much of Mrs R's experimental design. She has failed to control
for the order of treatments: there may be an effect that depends on
whether the man is fucking the same girl for the first or second time, and
this variable is not balanced out in the design. Half the girls should be
thin then fat, the other half fat then thin. Also all trials should be 'blind' -
so that the man doesn't know whether he has his dick in a fat or thin girl.
B-minus :D

Well, we’re only testing who fucks better, not conducting trials for a new drug!! Still, maybe Fancier has got a point, but then maybe we should introduce some placebos, i.e. women who’s body shape has not changed – we just tell the testers that the woman they are fucking is either fat or thin.

Mrs Roops
07-24-2007, 03:58 AM
(sorry to be dull, but I successfully resisted her entreaties to piss on her, or in her).
Actually its very intimate to release a steam of peewhen you’re snogging your partner in the shower . It sorta says I’m enjoying this so much that nothing else matters. Also I like to “let go” when Hubby has his hand in my crotch, again in the shower. Sometimes we do piss on each other, more as a laugh rather than any domination thing. We’ve even pissed into each other’s mouths on occasions though usually we’re not entirely sober when that happens.!!!!!

thesofamonster
07-25-2007, 02:22 AM
Well, we’re only testing who fucks better, not conducting trials for a new drug!! Still, maybe Fancier has got a point, but then maybe we should introduce some placebos, i.e. women who’s body shape has not changed – we just tell the testers that the woman they are fucking is either fat or thin.

one could really go barmy and introduce women into the test who are thin but think they are fat and women who are fat but think they are thin

Fancier
07-25-2007, 04:00 AM
one could really go barmy and introduce women into the test who are thin but think they are fat and women who are fat but think they are thin
Perhaps one of our budding literati (gow has an abundance of them) could
write us an erotic story set in a sexual-experiment laboratory. I'd do it
myself except that I'm very busy. I have to write an essay on Sir Moses
Montefiore for my OU course and also I have contracted to write a story
about pre-teen naughtiness for a new internet friend (who may be reading
this - Hello Mena!).